None of this makes sense.
In the world of television, there’s a term for the exact moment a show outstays its welcome and becomes so blatantly absurd that the audience can no longer suspend their disbelief: "Jumping the shark." It’s a reference to a late-season episode of Happy Days where Fonzie—leather jacket and all—literally jumped over a shark on water skis.
For those of us paying attention, America "jumped the shark" a long time ago. If you somehow were able to ignore reality for this long, the events at the most recent White House Correspondents' Dinner was a wake-up call.
The Intersection of Chaos and Comedy
I’ve always had a distaste for reality TV. Since the boom in the 90s, I’ve viewed it as bottom-of-the-barrel entertainment. But good lord, the "Donald Trump Show" is giving the entire genre a bad name.
Here is the scene: A man—allegedly armed with a shotgun, a handgun, and multiple knives—ran past security outside the ballroom. Inside, Donald Trump sat under a massive banner that (ironically) read: "Celebrating the First Amendment."
The man was subdued. The event was canceled. But it’s the way the media handled it that felt like a glitch in the simulation.
I watched this play out live on MS Now. It was a bizarre, disjointed experience. On one half of the screen, the ballroom was descending into visible chaos—people scrambling, security moving, a clear crisis unfolding. On the other half, the live commentators were still talking about ... comedians and jokes. It was as if the broadcasters weren't looking at their own feed. For about ten minutes, the world watched a void of information … in a ballroom full of journalists.
If this were a movie pitch, it would be rejected for being too dumb.
The Information Vacuum
Now, there were excuses. The ballroom has notoriously bad cellular reception; hotels have shitty Wi-Fi. When you shove a thousand people into a dead zone, communication dies.
But not 100%. Not across the board.
Every major news outlet was broadcasting from inside that room. This will eventually be the most well-documented crisis since January 6th (which is NOT to say they are at all comparable!). Yet, in the 40 minutes following the incident, virtually no information got out—except, of course, from one source.
Donald Trump.
In a room full of professional journalists, the narrative was owned by a tweet. Trump disclosed the shooter’s name, his image, and the "lone wolf" status before the press even knew what floor they were on. He effectively told the world, "The show must go on—but the mean security people won't let me back on stage."
The Absurdity Check: We allegedly know more about the White House Correspondents' Dinner shooter from a Trump tweet within an hour of the incident than we still know about the events in Butler, PA. Let that sink in.
A Culture Fetishizing the "John Wick" Fantasy
I am not making light of this, but I am trying to contextualize the absurdity. The imagery was hauntingly dissonant:
Groups of people milling about the ballroom, laughing and holding drinks.
The literal next frame showing people crouched under tables in abject terror, fearing for their lives.
School kids across the country watching the feed and thinking, "An active shooter? Must be just another day ending in ‘y.’"
American media—our movies, TV, and games—has a problem with fetishizing guns. We see violence through a lens of "plot armor." We imagine shooters running in guns blazing like they’re John Wick or Rambo.
In reality, if running full-tilt into a ballroom full of Secret Service while carrying a hardware store's worth of weapons was this guy’s "plan"... it was a remarkably dumb one. He allegedly had so many weapons it’s a wonder he could move. It felt less like a tactical strike and more like someone really wanted there to be no doubt that "this was the guy."
The Human Toll of the Spectacle
Whether this individual was truly that incompetent or if we’re looking at something more manufactured, the result is the same: The fear was real.
The journalists and guests taking cover under tables didn't know if they were going to make it home. They felt the cold adrenaline of a life-threatening moment.
And the most horrifying part? Nobody seems to care.
That is the true definition of jumping the shark. Once you’re on the other side of that moment—once you’ve scraped the bottom of the barrel for distracting story arcs—everything becomes too absurd for the audience to care.
We’ve moved past Fonzie jumping the shark. We’re at the part where the shark tears Fonzie in two, and the audience just changes the channel because the writing has gotten too lazy.
###
